As a parent, what would you do if your only son suddenly
became implicated in the horrible murder of one of his class-mates?
This is precisely the question Jacob’s parents must answer. In the quiet
suburban town of Newton, Massachusetts, Jacob’s
father, Andy Barber, is a highly respected assistant district attorney. When the
body of a 14-year old boy is found stabbed to death in the town’s park, Andy is
immediately on the case. But the case is going nowhere fast and the police have
no suspects and no leads. Then clues and details start pointing towards Jacob
as the prime suspect and Andy is taken off the case. How well does Andy really know his own son, and just how
far will he go to protect him?
Defending Jacob, by William Landay is told entirely from Andy’s point of view, so all
we know is what Andy knows. There is a lot of foreshadowing at the beginning of
the book, setting the reader up to believe that Jacob really did commit this horrendous
crime, but we never really know for sure if he’s the murderer. The descriptions
and details of Jacob and his personality set you up to think he is, but Andy’s unwavering
confidence in Jacob’s innocence often has you second guessing yourself. Andy is
often blind to the obvious sociopathic-like traits that Jacob presents with,
but I imagine as a parent, it would be hard to objectively see your child in
that way.
What I found most interesting about the story was that while Jacob was an
extremely unlikeable teenager and seemed completely capable of killing his own
class-mate, you wanted him to be found not guilty for the sake of his parents.
From the time Jacob was charged with murder, his parent’s life as they knew it
came crashing down. They were ostracized by their friends and neighbours, their
life-savings were stripped and Andy's career was at stake. I wanted desperately for Jacob to be innocent
just so his parent’s could hopefully, somehow, regain their lives back.
I don’t have a lot of experience with reading legal dramas,
but I really enjoyed this book. It’s a quick read at just over 400 pages
because so much of the story is dialogue. The court scenes were engaging and it
was just as exciting as watching a court drama on TV. It was a suspenseful read for the most part, and
I found the book hard to put down as you want to know - need to know - whether Jacob is found guilty or not-guilty. But then, just when you think the case is over
and a verdict has been reached, a curve ball is thrown at you and all I can say
is, I still get goose bumps when I
think about it. It was definitely not the ending I was expecting and I believe
it took the book from your typical run of the mill legal drama to a
steady-paced legal thriller.
Defending Jacob is a story full of legal mumbo-jumbo, there's no doubt about it, but more than that, it explores the infamous nature vs. nurture issue, loosely reminiscent of We Need to Talk About Kevin. A definite page-turner, and a story that had me thinking about it long after I turned the last page.